Message from @лодочник
Discord ID: 658900733558784000
and look at who funded them
which ones
eeinstien wasn't funded
in USA alone for example almost 50 percent of the studies are government funded
then think about all the others
einstien wasn't funded
im talking about today
even today
nah today majority of studies require large fundings
23% of studies aren't funded
and thats not a small minority
yes that is a minority and those studies without much fundings are using poor methodology
usually analyzing and interpeting data
not conducting anything really
so what are you trying to say
what are you trying to prove, ultimately.
nevermind
i forgot what i tried to point out
exactly
i believe i meant that main stream research should be taken with high skepticism
thats why the scientific method exists
well you guys were talking about climate science i doubt any scientific method was used there
it was
fine show me
what scientific method they used to prove humans cause global warming
guess what, they cant
in order for them to properly use the scientific method there, they would need to replicate a copy of the earth without humans and see if global warming happens
this is what a scientific method is, and just like many other fields of studies, climate science is very inaccurate simply because its near impossible to use the scientific method
so you mind explaining
NASA is already a discredited witness. any judge would throw out all their evidence in court
how did they discover man-made climate change
what methodology was used to come up with this conclusion
im asking you
yes. this is an organization we can trust....