@Flat Earth PhD am not a saint

ah ok lol

Then i joined that 24/7 and unluckly this guy was also callee saint and he was trolling and they thought it was me

And then they asked me to go to voice chat and prove myself

And now their nice

┏━━┓┏━━┓┏━━┓┏━━┓
┗━┓┃┃┏┓┃┗━┓┃┃┏┓┃
┏━┛┃┃┃┃┃┏━┛┃┃┃┃┃
In 2020 research flat Earth
┃┏━┛┃┃┃┃┃┏━┛┃┃┃┃
┃┗━┓┃┗┛┃┃┗━┓┃┗┛┃
┗━━┛┗━━┛┗━━┛┗━━┛

The year of disclosure

Flat Earth NASA Protest Event 2020

is the earth really flat????

yes

Well, depends on how you define flat, does it not?

Wouldn't it be more accurate to claim it as an erratic plane?

Due to the presence of vast peaks and falls within such a space

it would be best to describe it as a level-surfaced, motionless realm

imho

but that phrase doesn't exactly roll off the tongue so...

Flat Earth

Motionless realm?

What is realm describing, exactly?

flat surfaced earth (with unknown shape underneath), firmament with lights (e.g. moon, sun, stars, planets) which rotate above the motionless surface

And why refer to such as a firmament?

Is space, heavens, or sky insufficient?

I am curious about definitions, in particular, so my interest is very much peaked.

bcs there is no "space"

and there must be some kind of "dome" or "firmament"

by thermodynamics

whether a person thinks space is a vacuum or water

Which law of Thermodynamics states that?

I can think of the 1st, but it seems rather unrelated

Creation or destruction of energy in an isolated system does not in turn deny the possibility of an area with no inherent atmospheric conditions

Or, in other words, some kind of fluid for transmission of light

What was once suspected to be the aether

could still be

aether I mean

Could, but that tends to defy laws of Thermodynamics

Specifically the idea of an infinity of malleability

Whilst being able to bear the brunt of any and all universal forces or eventualities

I don't worry about such. not something I can easily prove/disprove with my research budget.....

It has to be able to withstand compression from other planetary bodies, after all.

What does your research budget focus on?

I have no reason to believe any of the celestial bodies are solid objects