Thats what telescopes are for dude

thats for the observation step

here is the scientific method

And the experimental step, you can't do a test without being able to see

the telescope provides the observation

you form a hypothesis

then do an experiment

You do the obeservations during the experiment dummy

Remember highschool?

omg

the process is above

Yes

that is the scientific method

You need a telescope to do the experiment, you need one to see objects in space unless you have super powers

It's not following the scientific method that makes you a scientist, its the doing experiments and recording what you see and being able to critically think about it that does

so describe the experiment using a telescope that proves a planet is a solid object

Well we're on one right now

and it IS The scientific method

that makes one a scientist.

if you do an experiment without a hypothesis you are not following the scientific method

so please explain the experiment

a hypothesis is needed for the scientific method, but the hypothesis doesn't need to be correct

that's what you are TESTING!!!!!!

omg

Take a telescope that has about 1000x magnification and look at a blinking light, it should show you s satalite

university graduate?

or not yet?

Not yet but I'm still able to debate with you

please go read the process again

you don't need your masters degree to understand the earth is a globe

Indeef

Indeef

@Flat Earth PhD whats your phd for

You use the experiment to determine whether you keep or reject the hypothesis

Omfg I gave you an experiment and hypothesis wtf more do you want

that is true, then you remodel your hypothesis to account for the error, then test it

describe the experiment to prove a planet is a solid object

using only a telescope

We're not talking about that right now, I'm not good enough at physics to explain that to you