with time yes

can you test the theory for it's formation

yes just not in one life time

lol if you think that is at all feesible

you can also 'test' supernovas then

Theoretically

one is far more possible

doesn't mean it's lab testable in any feasible way

there are many experiments that have taken more than one generation

in this kinda science, the scientific formula works like this: you dream up a hypotheses, you imagine the effects of that and then you see if the expected effects are a match for the real world.

is so, you were right, if not, u were rong

wrong

@inky the resources alone to recreate the formation of the grand canyon is absolutely insane

it's not just a matter of lifetimes

well duh, but you can scale it down

to what?

so you dont need to recreate the grand nothing in the lab

A tenth the size?

ok, ure both caught in this loop hole

derek lol

tell us the truth

(i know what hes gonna say 🙂 )

@Fran What is an non-physical property of matter? Wasn’t sure if you spilled the beans.

carbon dating is just as reliable as a full recreation

btw

@Derek Nelson I don't think there are nonphysical properties of matter

Err crap. I mean light. Sorry.

Carbon dating just tells us how old something is

could have been put together by an advanced race and not naturally formed

you know derek, globies can be wrong in their presentation of the model... this is normal in the real world

@Derek Nelson don't think there are nonphysical properties of light either

thats how science works in real life... mistakes are what drive us forward

ahahaha an advanced race

Oh. Heh. You asked an unanswerable question. I see what you did there.

Well your experiment says literally nothing about the formation other than these rocks older than these lol

im still wandering what drives forward the flat earth idea

i mean, its a locked narrative

thats not all that it is, thats just one technique, you can even find out the specific atmosphere that sediment formed in, and what its made of

which I can come up with a contrived explanation of easily

can you provide evidence?

maybe a wrong one