???

the effects of that, other then the roks

rocks

we'd live in the percicesly same world as we do today

like... i dont know, you and me being 2 years old max?

science is not philosophy lmao

is that possible?

cmmon

science is not the why, its the how

@inky it's inductive rationalization presuming physicality lmao

this is silly

no, its silly

it falls under the philosophical umbrella

Saying otherwise is scientism

still silly

scientism oh boy

@Alexxx why is it not possible

cause you and me are older then 2 years old

@inky do you think science can answer all things

no

that would be an effect of what you stated as your hypothesis

Ok good lmao

obviously

Philosophy is scientism.

im just running with youre idea dude lol

Then what's your aversion with hating scientism

no derek lol

there are other things in life other than science

Followers of scientism make the claim science can answer all things

They also treat pseudoscience as real science.

well it tries it best about the natural world

That’s simply not true.

we dont derek, stop misrepresenting us pls

Not talking about you.

i dont believe there is a single real scientist who says science can explain literally everything

pseudoscience i meant

Do you think the process of science can explain everything?

we dont treat that like real science

It's not just a single person lmao

im not asking if there's a single person who can answer every question

yes science explains why we are talking now