Message from @Derek Nelson
Discord ID: 667702153468444672
<:snapsnap:484956825863585792>
Correct me if I’m wrong but light doesn’t usually produce a shadow
Not generally, no.
@Derek Nelson what does a proof require
The earth is literally provable to be flat by the scientific method. That is the method that determines proof. It requires Observation, Measurement, and Experiment, in that order. All we ever observe in real life, is the earth being flat. All we ever measure for curvature, is Zero. All we can experiment with where we can duplicate water always seeking to find and maintain it’s level, is a flat earth.
N o
@Derek Nelson but the earth is a sphere
And it doesn’t matter what hypothesis you make, as long as it passes all 3 of those requirements. It’s that simple.
A ball earth hypothesis can’t pass those requirements.
it can tho
It’s why the globe is a theory, and Flat earth isn’t.
a primary school student knows what the scientific method is
the "scientific method" is a process not a specific experiment
there is literally no evidence in your debate
It’s a process that separates theory from fact.
yes, that is indeed correct Derek, as that is common knowledge by mere high school students
That process does require experiment.
however, what is the method of the flat earth "scientific method"
observation
this could be photoshopped
sources derek
do you know what they are
i need an author
date
please derek
why is there a horizon
there is no proof this is a nasa photograph
@Derek Nelson I forgot, can u remind me why things falls down, it's because of relative density, right?
my dear derek, what does this show?
They were obviously using a wide angle lens.
no derek, there is no evidence
apart from mere opinion
you realise the earth is quite big?
Problem is, at that height, you’re most definitely supposed to see a convex earth beneath. And a wide angle lens can’t bend a convex surface into the opposing shape concave.
therfore it takes up the whole screen>
thats not how it works
That’s definitely how it works.