Message from @indio007

Discord ID: 667707666076008448


2020-01-17 12:29:11 UTC  

its closer to the pole

2020-01-17 12:29:13 UTC  

The laser used by FECORE was never demonstrated to run parallel to the water's surface, across the entire target span.
In slide 13 they state:
"the laser beam was adjusted parallel to the water surface using the horizontal line and visible city light on the opposite shore as reference."
This alone invalidates all of FECORE's math and conclusions, because their laser beam was not parallel to the lakes water line.
---------------Every laser test past the primary horizon (2.85 meter laser height reaches the horizon at distance 6-km) has to contend with light bending, beam expansion and distortion from multiple effects, such as:

This "This alone invalidates all of FECORE's math and conclusions, because their laser beam was not parallel to the lakes water line." Is literally circular logic

2020-01-17 12:29:14 UTC  

therefore movement is slowed

2020-01-17 12:29:16 UTC  

its in the name

2020-01-17 12:29:17 UTC  

can you tell me in your own words?

2020-01-17 12:29:18 UTC  

cmon anon

2020-01-17 12:29:20 UTC  

you can do better

2020-01-17 12:29:22 UTC  

can you read?

2020-01-17 12:29:31 UTC  

my own words would be opinion

2020-01-17 12:29:35 UTC  

therefore facts would be altered

2020-01-17 12:29:40 UTC  

read the article for yourself

2020-01-17 12:30:12 UTC  

what are you trying to say, im still right

2020-01-17 12:30:18 UTC  

how can the earth axis be pointing at same star throughout the whole year?

2020-01-17 12:30:42 UTC  

with all the motions surely the polaris should be moving as well

2020-01-17 12:30:50 UTC  

Refraction of the beam was ACCOUNTED for , mot only by calculation but by measuring for any refraction. The fact the test was done at increasing distance by hoirzontally panning the laser PROVES there could be no refraction.

2020-01-17 12:30:53 UTC  

http://bit.do/fptrQ i believe this image instantly proves my point

2020-01-17 12:31:14 UTC  

@NinjaMaster like I said. Your refutation sums up to Nuh-uh

2020-01-17 12:31:16 UTC  

@anon415454+4646 are you referring to the sun?

2020-01-17 12:31:29 UTC  

what?

2020-01-17 12:31:50 UTC  

Did you just post a cartoon earth?

2020-01-17 12:31:53 UTC  

LOL

2020-01-17 12:31:58 UTC  

Yes he did.

2020-01-17 12:32:07 UTC  

it proves my point

2020-01-17 12:32:09 UTC  

does it not

2020-01-17 12:32:39 UTC  

@indio007 they still use snell law which does not account for mirage, turbulance.... etc

2020-01-17 12:32:58 UTC  

which will through their math off alot

2020-01-17 12:33:28 UTC  

>
> Did you just post a cartoon earth?
> @indio007 no that is earth

2020-01-17 12:33:32 UTC  

anon, I am sorry but do you know what an axis is?

2020-01-17 12:33:33 UTC  

you're talking out your ass, There is no evidence for a mirage or turbulence. They measured the meteorological conditions/ And mirages do not happen at all distances

2020-01-17 12:33:41 UTC  

@Just what's the source?

2020-01-17 12:33:43 UTC  

ik its year 7 but please anon

2020-01-17 12:33:43 UTC  

2020-01-17 12:34:04 UTC  

the source is the hubble telescope

2020-01-17 12:34:07 UTC  

it took that picture

2020-01-17 12:34:11 UTC  

the earth points to the same star because it staus on the same axis anon its not hard

2020-01-17 12:34:15 UTC  

AND they did it two different days , and got identical results, April 8th and 20th

2020-01-17 12:34:28 UTC  

So keep flopping around

2020-01-17 12:34:34 UTC  

hi

2020-01-17 12:34:51 UTC  

Keep throwing shit against the wall surely something might stick LOL

2020-01-17 12:35:33 UTC  

https://fecore.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Dia15.jpg clear mirage and cross wind, cross wind in the lihgt beam and mirage seen on both pictures in the city