Not definite.
cocain and suggar are 2 propositions seeing white powder is potential evidence i however would argue that in this context its not evidence as it dosnt support one over the other
You would find that difficult to argue in court.
Anyway. You said rotation necessitates coriolis. It’s a claim that earth rotates. You really have to prove that rotation first.
i never claimed it rotates
i said rotation necesitates coreolis
What’s rotating?
anything
....
anything that rotates necesitates coreolis in the frame attached to the object thats rotating
You actually do have to be specific.
why
even if i was specific to the earth rotating implies coreolis
what then
You’d have to prove how the earth is rotating.
on its axis north to south at one rotation per day
thats how its rotating
That’s not a proof.
proof of what
Rotation.
You’re giving a theoretical explanation.
why do i need to prove rotation
Because it’s your claim.
im granting rotation rotation implies coreolis
This is just redundant. You can’t prove earth rotation. Thank you.
im not saying rotation or coreolis exist im saying rotation implies coreolis
wasnt trying to @Derek Nelson
saying A -> B dosnt mean im saying A or B
potatos have sugar implies potatos taste sweet
this is true even if potatos dont have sugar
Hey anyone know how to find q on 8kun
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS79Pk4naEk
I like cartoons
Ok
Perhaps I’m mistaken, but I thought the car was expelled out of the cargo bay after reaching orbit, not dragged along by a cable?
@Derek Nelson what r u referencing?
The reflection of the cable hoist on the car.
^^^^
The car is attached to a frame
how is the camera fixed to it
@Derek Nelson
