both the north and south wanted to free slaves, niggers were like 1% of the reason for civil war

1% rofl

"The civil war had nothing to do with slavery"

id say less

@T e x so what were the other reasons

but 1% is being nice tot hem

educate us

I mean its hard to say it wasent a factor at all

Taxation without representation and the union using banks and globalist policies to fuck us

globalism wasent a thing yet tex

globalist

rofl

yes it was

I laughed

I studied the early american economy

g l o b a l i s m

there wasent globalism yet

^

its not a thing until better communication existed

we fought to break out of globalism, succeeded, and britain followed us here twice

yes there was

no there wasn't

lol

yes there was omg

Tex globalism requires you to even know the world exists entirely

and it requires effiecent communication

British Empire wasn't globalism you mongol

alright the preceeding to globalism

You cant do global level work when it takes 3 months to sent a message

I mean at that point you can argue any trade is globalism

I put the idea of globalism square around 1960s

the union was funded by british bankers

I don't think that tex realises that the declaration of independence and the American civil war were different events...

when we could actually get places with a low chance of dying across the sea

fuck the declaration of independence

ok

The South traded with the UK more than the North fuck boi

we can always reverse it if you want @T e x

but we werent owned by financial interests and the union was all about money

I do