while normal graze is digested and then can be used to build hormones or be stocked as graze (which's bad)

so glycosis itself is energy but when you consume too much you body for storage compacts it in the form of saturated graze

this causes hearth diseases, cancer and inflamations for example

so yeah, sugar's cancer food

well cancer is caused by disruption of a cell's division

there's a certain sequence, in which if skipped, the cell will endlessly divide

Let's be less specific, cancer is caused by a bad mutation, an error in cell division, such errors can be caused by a lot of stuff

yes

it can be completely natural

or caused by a disruption of chemicals or radiation

etc

Including sugar

you can't really avoid sugar so you're basically saying most foods are cancer food

Cancer's not like that

even oxygen causes cancer

staying still causes cancer

it's a really complex thing

but you never actually caught a cancer for breathing, not the way you imagine

the definition of cancer is far too broad and you do have cancer, not on the way you imagine (like, been forced to stay on a hospital bed for the rest of your shrinking life)

but cancer is not the problem of sugar

it's getting fatter, having health diseases and the fact that it's an inflamatory

this is my point

Then I am sorry but you where not clear because " you're basically saying most foods are cancer food" I said this statement is true

yes

Sugar isn't cancer food, although it is definitly a lot less healthy than lipids and protiens and normal carbohydrates (not fructose or sucrose)

Well most cancers feed of sugar. That doesnt mean sugar causes cancer though, however table sugar is refined and highly inflammatory so probably does. Sugar from good sources like fruits, honey, and maple syrup probably is not carcinogenic

you can find a variety of sugars in different foods

Ya but my point was sugar is cancer if its from a bad source.

And ofcourse moderation

Is important

i agree with moderation

but the term "bad source" is somewhat misleading

because it's about the sugar itself and how your body breaks it down

I was at a mind-body-soul expo (my wife likes to buy cool rocks at these, I'm no hippie) and there was a presentation going on for alkaline water and how it *cures cancer* and *buy an alkalizing water machine for $3000* to make your body alkaline, cure cancer and be healthy. I couldn't believe they actually made the claim.

fructose isn't a bad sugar, but excessive consumption will cause medical issues

It makes me so mad to think of all those poor people with cancer hoping for any sort of miracle that can help them, willing to shell out thousands of dollars they don't have to snake oil salesmen.

fun fact glucose is slightly flammable

on the fire diamond it has a 1

Bad source is not really a misleading term. Refined Sugar depletes your body of vitaminss and minerals. Natural sources of sugar usually contain those same nutrients that you risk losing. They also contain enzymes that help with the absorption and breaking down of sugar.

at this point we really aren't talking just about sugars anymore

All im trying to say sugar on paper is not equal