@IXI answer my question

You haven’t explained it black

> @blacK
@blacK

oops

> When the Moon is high, the clouds it is against are closer to the viewer and appear larger. When the Moon is low in the sky, the same clouds are further away and appear smaller, giving the illusion of a larger Moon.
@blacK

there

@IXI

I don’t get it. So if the moon is high it’s larger and if it’s low it’s larger

?

Japan’s photo from the moon surface

no

when its high it *appears*

can u answer my question

Nope u still didn’t explain that

Anyways I’ll head to bed

please do

Enough chatting with glories for today

you aren’t the smartest

its been explained far too many times

at this point you have to be trolling

Clearly I’m not the smart one here. You act like your drunk and I had to explain the photo 20 times since You apparently forget what it’s about every 5 seconds

Then quote Kylie without understanding the non sense she said

That wasn't nonsense it was basic photography

Take a photography class if you don't understand

If it were basic photography it wouldn't be like that.

The moon being higher or lower doesn't have anything to do with it. Different camera lens focal lengths will give you *vastly* different images. Basically, the higher the focal length, the more the background is "flattened" together with the foreground. Take a look:
https://cdn-ep19.pressidium.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/focal-length-comparison.jpg

Oh i see

Japan's photo of the moon's surface would have a shallow focal length and capture more of the foreground, but the earth would appear distant. If the ship was very far away from the moon and zoomed in on it, you'd get a much, much larger earth.

I actually made a short vid to demonstrate, just a sec.

Okay makes sense now.

Ofcourse still doesnt prove we went to thr moon but sure that pic doesnt disprove it either

oh, totally. It doesn't prove we went, just that the varying images we see are technically *possible*.

Iv been looking for a channel like this for so long

<:PotatoFlatEarth:651630736712925195>

OK I'm glad that was cleared up

That was satisfying to read

Hi Guys, I'm really interested in this sand smuggling theory. It kind of makes sense to me. Does anyone else have any resources on this?

Chef toasty, you miss the point of this channel dude

Nah