Difference is, far fewer today than in the 1700s.

If you disagree with that, than I am sorry, but you are naive.

So a person in the 1700s who had acces to food and shelter

Died at 50

?

Yes.

While the same person today lives longer because of modern medicine

Or in his early 60s.

Okay can you tell me which medicine is saving us this hard

?

And what exactly killed them so early

In a lot of cases, small pox, 'big' pox (syphilis), and various other diseases like such. Even into the Early 1900s Smallpox, the Spanish Flu and similar were huge killers.

As for what was a huge solution...I could tell you, but you may very well not like the answer.

So I'll refrain from aggravating you.

Once again

I said had acces to food and shelter

Both of those diseases occured during times of starvation

And once again, I have said 'yes.'

And industrialization

And no, you're thinking more of Cholera there.

Where people lived in dumps

Which was also a major killer

but was not because of Miasma

No im talking about those two diseases

Syphilis was actually far more prolific among royalty.

For a very specific and not-too-pleasant reason.

And btw modern medicine didnt eliminate them

They vanished on theit own

Their

It did, but I'm not interested in arguing that with you.

How

You won't be convinced either way on that matter, so it is a moot point.

Explain how

No i can always be convinced but you clearly are ignorant and know nothing

Dont make claims you cant back up

Evidently, that's a false statement.

But you refer to Ad Hominems more than you do to science, so for that, have fun.

Ok then explaim how modern medicine solved the problem of spanish flu or small pox

Feel free to continue talking, but if anyone else has questions and actually would like to learn about it, feel free to let me know.

LOL what a clown

Unfortunately, that's a mirror.