I literally quoted you

"So you're saying that less then 10% of the population are vaccinated for variolation?
Or something else?"

"Yes
So the vaccine didnt eradicate it"

The vaccine didn't eradicate variolation.

Amazing.

Yes because i thought ur so dumb

To understand

Literally

But you kept using the term

So i corrected tou

You

Kek.

Looo you used it first

Look

I think you're trying to back-pedal now. This is quite humorous.

> So you're saying that less then 10% of the population are vaccinated for variolation?
@Saturn

Variolation was a method to counter smallpox

Literally used it first

I knew its wrong

As a question, since you seemed to think it was a disease.

Which it isn't.

But since you are illiterate i went with it a little

I never said its a disease

You appear to of thought so.

You said that first and i went with it

It is okay, though.

No

I quoted you

You don't have to worry.

Look up

"Well, if you'd like to know the specific reason, Variolation played a huge part initially in preventing the spread of those diseases, the former specifically."

"Its easily debunked by the simple fact less than 10 percent of the people vaccinated for it"

You don't think people are falling for that, do you?

Okay where did i say variolation is a disease

Regardless, I don't need to reason with you since both you and I know where you slipped up.

Others, however.

Need to know the distinction.

I didnt though

Variolation isn't something you are vaccinated for

You just play dumb

It is a technique that was primarily used prior to vaccines.

And was quite invasive, and expensive.

> So you're saying that less then 10% of the population are vaccinated for variolation?
@Saturn