<:chad:625496270492008469> my whole stance on this is that through one culture, i have seen massive amounts of degeneracy especially through the age of information and its availability. I have seen people denounce this culture, who would be initially tied to it. They see the issues and adopt a more, well mannered culture in place and denounce such.

<:chad:625496270492008469> why can people not make the distinction between race and culture?

<:chad:625496270492008469> say if you were to call someones culture degenerate, and you state the glorification of unhealthy and destructive aspects, why do they feel that you are attacking their race? can they not make the distinction between the two?

<:chad:625496270492008469> does race, simply bind someones characteristics, their culture?

<:chad:625496270492008469> what does this say about people who denounce their culture, are they simply not that race anymore?

<:chad:625496270492008469> why would someone be called a bigot simply if they do not support someones culture, but have no spite against the individuals race?

<:chad:625496270492008469> am i supposed to support all cultures then?

<:chad:625496270492008469> Racism is the belief that groups of humans possess different behavioral traits corresponding to physical appearance, and can be divided based on the superiority of one race over another.

<:chad:625496270492008469> according to this, if i call someones culture degenerate, am i being racist? am i calling out their race and stating superiority?

<:chad:625496270492008469> definition of bigot: One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

<:chad:625496270492008469> can you be culturally intolerant, but not be racially intolerant?

<:chad:625496270492008469> when i try and mention this to others, i usually get met with the term bigot, racist, and simply wrong. when are descriptors and vague statements justification?

<:chad:625496270492008469> back to one of the key roots, why can people not see past the difference between race and culture? its because they lack an original opinion, they are hive minded and spoon fed to be an apologist. They do not distinguish the definitions because they have been taught so.

<:chad:625496270492008469> why should i raise my children to be apologist? to be a centrist? why are people disassociating from their history, to appease all? To appease a group of people for something that happened generations before? Why do the apologists feel guilt and trauma for generational past, now is now, past is past

if anyone genuinely has a rebuttal, good study for ignorance or a valid answer feel free to respond. Why are so many bred to be an apologist?

Ignorance is bliss

^

Astrophysics isn’t science
Change my mind

It is.

We all know how flat Sun formed right?

Thor smashed it with his hammer.

When and where do they apply the scientific method? @GreeceGuy PhD

Oh damn that's a hard one

Are you flat earther or normal earther?

Human

So anyway

When do they apply the scientific method?

That's a question for flat Sun?

No for you

You said astrophysics is science

So when do they apply the scientific method?

lol

Nah, well it's basically all just a theory. I mean you can't really apply it if it's used for observing stars and finding out how they formed right?

Science isn’t theories

It is

no scientific method. not a science. but rather a pseudoscience

like paleontology

It's a science because dumb people can't understand it

No
Measurement and observable reality are not theories
You are confusing pseudoscience and science
Pseudoscience is theories

I mean, science is all just a big theory