Ah, I guess what you were trying to say is that on FE you should be ab;e to use more and more powerful telescopes to resolve the ship again?

Assuming you watched it dissappear once bottom up using whatever

https://youtu.be/RSSFfoAIx04

Problem is Phuket's entiar argument is based on atmospheric refraciton. Which is expected to bend light the opposite way over water to over land as it is dependent on the temperature gradient.

His 'band of convergence' is just the mirage from the ground being hot

Im not an optical expert myself

So no comment

Im sure someone more experienced can answer ur questions

Fair enough

I will say to take Phuket's stuff with a pinch of salt though, as from what i've seen he seems a bit of an idiot

That said, I haven't seen all of his stuff

Me neither im not really following with FE content as i should

Cant keep up with all my learning goals. There is so much to learn in everything

I suggest looking into optics stuff, it's interesting.

Sure

Im more intrested in economics and health than in physics

Also fair

Have you studied physics at all, out of interest?

Yes

I studied it quite in depth until my senior year. Our school had a strong physics program

However i dont major in anything that has to do with it now

I did study optics but i just cant recall all details

Yeah fair. You still studying then?

Im in uni

Awesome 🙂

👍

Anyways i gtg

Nice talking to u ill definitely look into the optics of ship disappearing sometime soon

No worries, take care 🙂 Nice - let me know what you think of it

Can someone explain how flat earth formed without using religion as an answer (I'm an atheist, so I don't believe in gods)

tough one

Lol who belives the earth is flat

Flat earthers.

Lmao

Imagine believing the earth is flat

@kylie You could use alchemy as an answer

No, alchemy was the process of changing elements to other elements

It didnt work, and never will.

@Koka

hm, well the only other explanation was that yhwh forged earth into form

then pour water unto the earth