Message from @jeremy
Discord ID: 691087139710173185
when I'm trying to think of the simplest way to explain it
Sure take ur time idk what kind of impatience u are dealing with I have been waiting patiently for about 5 hours it’s cool
I’ve been waiting about 2 years for some scientific evidence for the heliocentric model. So it’s all good get some rest come back tomorrow refreshed and ready with some science
try to draw the stellar constellations and compare these drawings to those you (or a friend) makes on the southern hemisphere. Then compare both to the drawings you can make in equatorial regions.
sorry do u have any science for the heliocentric model ?
Still thinking of balls?
just make that experiment. it is the scientific method. watch and make observations, then make your own theories, and compare the theories to new experiments & observations.
oh u have an experiment ok
natural pbserved phenomena is ?
whats ur natural observed phenomena for this experiment
the night sky (without clouds)
both spheres and circles can be defined as the set of all points below the distance "R" (radius) from the C (center point). it's just one does it in 3 dimensions.
my thoughts on balls.
only use eyes, you dont even need binoculars.
cloudless night sky is your natural observed phenomena ?
yes or no ?/
yeah
ok whats the hypothesis
no hypothesis. just draw what you can see, and then travel, make the same drawings and then compare both.
u cant do an experiment without a hypothesis
or ask a friend in these regions to make the drawings
go learn how science works please
then come back ill be here waiting
science starts with observation.
always.
observe a natural phenomena is step one yes
not just observation
u must observe a natural phenomena
u think its any observation ?
The goal is of course to understand how the stellar constellations are connected, and what their form is.
first off u said u dont need a hypothesis for an experiment lol its obvious u dont know how science works u have clearly demonstrated that to this whole group
to make a hypothesis, you need to first make your observations.
when u say observation u mean observe a natural phenomena ?
yes.
and u think u can do an experiment without a hypothesis ?
yes or no
To make any hypothesis, you need data first.
to make a hypothesis u only need your natural observed phenomena
would u like an example of a real science experiment
Of course you can start with a hypothesis, but i proposed it this way, so that your experiment is unbiased.