This is the standard convention for scientific publications

Here are some example guidelines..

https://abacus.bates.edu/~ganderso/biology/resources/writing/HTWsections.html

https://www.askscientific.com/structure-of-a-scientific-paper-made-easy/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3626472/

Soooo, the sun doesn't work like every single other obect in existence because "it's just complicated"

Plenty of people have looked down for answers, it's time to start looking up

And also, you use a completely wrong definition of religion to call us religious

re·li·gion
/rəˈlijən/
Learn to pronounce
noun
the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.

An people please stop trying to invalidate claims by just calling them "religious"

Unlike the globe earth, the flat earth would require a god.
Also, if there is a god, they suck at creating things.

Let's do a cool little experiment, take the mesurements for how big the countries are and how big the oceans are, then using this data try to make a non-distorted map

Should be easy.

You don't need pictures from up above to make a good map

LOL. you're right. it would be so easy to map Earth 🙂

why didn't I think of that....

I'm just saying because every time I ask a flat earther for a good non-distorted map they make excuses

because...they are valid excuses. we don't have a source of funding...esp one that reaches into the hundreds of millions.

maybe you can help us

describe for us the protocol for mapping the Earth

Dude you can look up the sizes of the continents without millions of dollors

"look up" what does that mean? who is supplying the data?

Soo, now your saying the people who make the maps, the normal people who post info online ect are all lieing

here is an example...

Let's add a good 1,000+ liars to your conspiracy that keeps growing, because apparently everyone who has ever mapped the earth is a liar

let's "look up" what Earth looks like from space

I'm not saying from space.

hmmm

Dude stop avoiding what I'm saying.

it's an example of what happens when you trust everything you "look up"

Your honestly twisting my words.

I just said we don't need pictures from the sky to map stuff

I'm talking mapping from on-earth

I want an independent mapping of all land masses by a non-Freemason associated group, with complete and verifiable documentation of the entire process and access to the raw data

then....and only then....would I even consider a map reliable

So, I'm right, you think every mapper ever is a liar

well so far....every "space agency" is a liar

so....

why not?

I'm not talking about space agencies

Omfg