Message from @Flat Earth PhD

Discord ID: 652025095568621569


2019-12-05 04:08:33 UTC  

Let's debunk this one

2019-12-05 04:13:38 UTC  

how does flat earth account for 24 hour sunlight in the antarctic during the summer solstice?

2019-12-05 05:25:52 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484516084846952451/652017778206965760/FEEarthBestProof.gif

2019-12-05 05:50:10 UTC  

@Citizen Z thanks for posting the Olbers Paradox meme! I had forgotten about that. back in grad school I was taking an advanced mathematics for physicists course and the prof (also head of our theoretical chemistry group) put this problem on one of our exams. When we discussed later, he didn't offer an explanation for why we don't see this in real life and just said "it's interesting, isn't it? with a little smile :). He was a devout Christian so perhaps he had a suspicion that something is wrong but didn't dare bring it up in class. I should contact him and discuss FE. He is one of the sharpest guys I've ever met.

2019-12-05 05:50:44 UTC  

Its because of redshift

2019-12-05 05:50:56 UTC  

no I think it's gravity

2019-12-05 05:51:13 UTC  

I don't see how gravity would cause that effect?

2019-12-05 05:51:16 UTC  

it sucks the light away so we can't see it

2019-12-05 05:51:21 UTC  

Yes its interesting.

2019-12-05 05:51:26 UTC  

wha?

2019-12-05 05:51:35 UTC  

🤣

2019-12-05 05:51:57 UTC  

😄

2019-12-05 05:52:06 UTC  

oh its a joke

2019-12-05 05:52:34 UTC  

sorry. we shouldn't make a joke of space.

2019-12-05 05:52:39 UTC  

that's NASAs job

2019-12-05 05:52:56 UTC  

Whats a joke?

2019-12-05 05:53:07 UTC  

we pay them $20 billion per year so we shouldn't do their work for them...

2019-12-05 05:54:15 UTC  

The explination for this paradox fyi is that light that travels long distances gets shifted to lower frequency, an effect called "redshift." This means that stars that are very far away emit below viable ranges.

2019-12-05 05:54:56 UTC  

right. millions and billions of "light years" away!

2019-12-05 05:55:21 UTC  

but there is cosmic background radiation at lower frequencies that is similar to what the paradox describes that you can detect with a large telescope

2019-12-05 05:55:40 UTC  

hmm....I think I'm sticking with gravity

2019-12-05 05:55:42 UTC  

pardon the pun 🙂

2019-12-05 06:00:20 UTC  

The solution to the Olbers paradox is that there are many things in between the stars and the Earth, like nebula which absorb nearly all visible light

2019-12-05 06:00:29 UTC  

i am stuck on probability hw

2019-12-05 06:00:31 UTC  

😠

2019-12-05 06:01:05 UTC  

ironically i have probability hw i should be doing rn

2019-12-05 06:01:22 UTC  

i get answer two different ways that both seem right but they both different

2019-12-05 06:01:23 UTC  

yuck

2019-12-05 06:01:40 UTC  

There is light everywhere in the universe in the form of the cosmic microwave background

2019-12-05 06:01:53 UTC  

u can post the question and i can try to help if u want

2019-12-05 06:02:00 UTC  

im not sure if i can

2019-12-05 06:03:02 UTC  

"Jimmy is one of n people playing a game. They take turins flipping a biased coin for which the probability of heads is equal to p and tails is q= 1-p. They will go one after another in a predetermined order; once someone flips heads the game is over and he/she is declared the winner." Find a closed form expression for the expected value of the number of times jimmy flips the coin if he is LAST in line

2019-12-05 06:03:08 UTC  

I have my first method which is

2019-12-05 06:03:53 UTC  

E(coin flips) = 0*p(J doesnt flip) + 1*p(J flips and wins) + (1 + E(coin flips))*p(J flips and doesnt win)

2019-12-05 06:04:04 UTC  

but this doesnt give me same answer as brute forcing

2019-12-05 06:04:25 UTC  

1p(j wins first flip) + 2(j wins 2nd flip) + 3(j wins 3rd flip) + .....

2019-12-05 06:04:27 UTC  

and evaluating series

2019-12-05 06:06:09 UTC  

so the expected number of total flips for everyone is 1 / p is i believe

2019-12-05 06:06:19 UTC  

50%