Message from @Flat Earth PhD

Discord ID: 652024252337356823


2019-12-04 23:34:16 UTC  
2019-12-05 00:56:07 UTC  

the earth is actually a triangle

2019-12-05 00:59:21 UTC  

No <:PotatoFlatEarth:651630736712925195>

2019-12-05 00:59:30 UTC  

prove me wrong

2019-12-05 01:09:06 UTC  

If the sun circles us then the logical conclusion would be a ring of ice around us where the sun cant reach. So the known earth is a circle

2019-12-05 01:20:15 UTC  

but wouldnt the sun melt the ice

2019-12-05 01:37:51 UTC  

@Pewdielie yes to a certain point

2019-12-05 02:56:34 UTC  

Just as is observed

2019-12-05 04:08:33 UTC  

Let's debunk this one

2019-12-05 04:13:38 UTC  

how does flat earth account for 24 hour sunlight in the antarctic during the summer solstice?

2019-12-05 05:25:52 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484516084846952451/652017778206965760/FEEarthBestProof.gif

2019-12-05 05:50:10 UTC  

@Citizen Z thanks for posting the Olbers Paradox meme! I had forgotten about that. back in grad school I was taking an advanced mathematics for physicists course and the prof (also head of our theoretical chemistry group) put this problem on one of our exams. When we discussed later, he didn't offer an explanation for why we don't see this in real life and just said "it's interesting, isn't it? with a little smile :). He was a devout Christian so perhaps he had a suspicion that something is wrong but didn't dare bring it up in class. I should contact him and discuss FE. He is one of the sharpest guys I've ever met.

2019-12-05 05:50:44 UTC  

Its because of redshift

2019-12-05 05:50:56 UTC  

no I think it's gravity

2019-12-05 05:51:13 UTC  

I don't see how gravity would cause that effect?

2019-12-05 05:51:16 UTC  

it sucks the light away so we can't see it

2019-12-05 05:51:21 UTC  

Yes its interesting.

2019-12-05 05:51:26 UTC  

wha?

2019-12-05 05:51:35 UTC  

🤣

2019-12-05 05:51:57 UTC  

😄

2019-12-05 05:52:06 UTC  

oh its a joke

2019-12-05 05:52:34 UTC  

sorry. we shouldn't make a joke of space.

2019-12-05 05:52:39 UTC  

that's NASAs job

2019-12-05 05:52:56 UTC  

Whats a joke?

2019-12-05 05:53:07 UTC  

we pay them $20 billion per year so we shouldn't do their work for them...

2019-12-05 05:54:15 UTC  

The explination for this paradox fyi is that light that travels long distances gets shifted to lower frequency, an effect called "redshift." This means that stars that are very far away emit below viable ranges.

2019-12-05 05:54:56 UTC  

right. millions and billions of "light years" away!

2019-12-05 05:55:21 UTC  

but there is cosmic background radiation at lower frequencies that is similar to what the paradox describes that you can detect with a large telescope

2019-12-05 05:55:40 UTC  

hmm....I think I'm sticking with gravity

2019-12-05 05:55:42 UTC  

pardon the pun 🙂

2019-12-05 06:00:20 UTC  

The solution to the Olbers paradox is that there are many things in between the stars and the Earth, like nebula which absorb nearly all visible light

2019-12-05 06:00:29 UTC  

i am stuck on probability hw

2019-12-05 06:00:31 UTC  

😠

2019-12-05 06:01:05 UTC  

ironically i have probability hw i should be doing rn

2019-12-05 06:01:22 UTC  

i get answer two different ways that both seem right but they both different

2019-12-05 06:01:23 UTC  

yuck

2019-12-05 06:01:40 UTC  

There is light everywhere in the universe in the form of the cosmic microwave background

2019-12-05 06:01:53 UTC  

u can post the question and i can try to help if u want

2019-12-05 06:02:00 UTC  

im not sure if i can