Er... not necessarily

The proof is insufficient.

That's the case Aaron is making.

The errors between the gravitation from Newton's law of gravity and relativity are going to be extraordinarly small when you are applying it to the cavendish experiment

globe

These errors work for most of the planets behaviors too

Only some funky behavior of the orbit of mercy is noticably affected

And we are talking about BIG masses here

where as the cavendish experiment is what

50 lb lead balls?

idk

wait

is the earth only flat

I mean, is there a different proof that we go off of for gravity?

or every planet

its flat and stationary

planets are lights

moon too

not solid objects

I'm responding to Aaron.

so

Lol

is mars

a light

yes

them moon is a light

If I had to guess Aaron might be right. But hes still a cunt. Theres better ways to debate without coming across as an insufferable autist

Moon is light

yes

Water always seeks it's level. This is only possible on a flat earth model.

guys

wait but we have been on the moon

not the first time this has been proposed. and explains the fake moon landings

@chief slapahoe True

wait

on the g man the moon is in a glass ball

no

and people predicted we could never land on it

You can't appeal to a plumb line becausethat relies on fixed points in space.

ah

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oCNGcbwxWg&t=13s