Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 658572621360791553
You said that and I agreed
Lol
and
assumed
well joked i dont know trig
thats not very loving others as yourself buddy
Or algebra
😌
I'll love who I like
i mean if ur christian u should love everyone as jesus did but
sure 🤷🏻♀️
You can't appeal to classical mechanics and relativity. Classical mechanics relies on fixed points in space.
Your model is incoherent.
And yet it is perfectly fine for building bridges
@♡ sonia ♡ Love is good
Models being 'incoherent' only makes sense if the claim is that the model is universal
ok then?
That's called pragmatism. You're admitting that your model is false, but useful.
No one these days claims the universality of classical mechanics
They say 'for X situation classical mechanics works'
So it's incomplete.
Er... not necessarily
The proof is insufficient.
That's the case Aaron is making.
The errors between the gravitation from Newton's law of gravity and relativity are going to be extraordinarly small when you are applying it to the cavendish experiment
globe
These errors work for most of the planets behaviors too
Only some funky behavior of the orbit of mercy is noticably affected
And we are talking about BIG masses here
where as the cavendish experiment is what
50 lb lead balls?
idk
wait
is the earth only flat
I mean, is there a different proof that we go off of for gravity?
or every planet
its flat and stationary
planets are lights
moon too
not solid objects