Message from @Amthyric
Discord ID: 659119245648723989
that it was like an adapater
where the light came from he couldnt explain
@Flat Earth PhD you mean the phosphorescence?
not quite self-luminary
@ibn la'ahad yeah
it's clearly not a solid object
fluorescence and phosphorescence are far from self-luminary
I have rocks that can do that
scientists hypothesized it was plasma 60 years ago
but you need an external light source to start the process
even predicted we could never land on the moon
they were right 🙂
nothing can land on it
I'm stuck on the phosphorescence
that is not self-luminary
by definition
it is NOT self-illuminating
you need to allow the material to "charge" in a more powerful light source first
and allow that energy to be released slowly back out
@ibn la'ahad feel free to write. I ignore the shill ^^
you cant just regurgitate what you learned from mainstream science
in fact. I think I can just block him/her
not as a mod
@Flat Earth PhD nasa lies to us obviously
if someone teached you that 1 + 1 = 4
no
because I can get blocks
your just going to go around in circles
no i can block you
1 block and another block is two blocks
you didn't do yourself any favors by changing your nn
@Flat Earth PhD do you think that the bible is more reliable than modern science? I'm inclined to think that way
the bible just makes way more sense
absolutely. Like I tell people... Genesis is the most scientifically accurate book ever written
that coming from a PhD scientist and former atheist
@ibn la'ahad I can prove that 1+1=/=4
Yes the bible speaks true about the true nature of constellations
so can you prove it is self-luminary?
yep