Message from @floridaswamptrash

Discord ID: 664211559936950272


2020-01-07 20:57:14 UTC  

@Drewski4343 and yes, quite clearly

2020-01-07 20:57:35 UTC  

Anyways, I have had and have launched rockets before.

2020-01-07 20:57:35 UTC  

har

2020-01-07 20:57:35 UTC  

The two are different but do mix a lot

2020-01-07 20:57:36 UTC  

Religion and philosophy

2020-01-07 20:57:38 UTC  

that's a world record photo, I'm afraid.

2020-01-07 20:57:42 UTC  

Those of course are always smaller than nominal )))

2020-01-07 20:57:54 UTC  

Well, the two often build off the other

2020-01-07 20:57:58 UTC  

Think of Daoism

2020-01-07 20:58:13 UTC  

Lmao, that shits fake

2020-01-07 20:58:18 UTC  

Religion has it's own building blocks

2020-01-07 20:58:22 UTC  

Look at the ocean

2020-01-07 20:58:34 UTC  

Philosophy uses them

2020-01-07 20:58:42 UTC  

You can see the three lines.

2020-01-07 20:58:43 UTC  

*The problem is that the standards to test many ideas like these are meet the experimental requirements are too out of this world for us to do. Too high energy levels would be needed. Then again, some theories have been at least partially tested.*

2020-01-07 20:58:45 UTC  

I'd say those blocks are often interchangeable

2020-01-07 20:58:54 UTC  

Which stemmed first, well, is a question of philosophy itself.

2020-01-07 20:59:04 UTC  

Whether we believe religion or philosophy came first

2020-01-07 20:59:12 UTC  

Personally, I tend to think they are generally far more similar

2020-01-07 20:59:18 UTC  

Than we generally give credence to.

2020-01-07 20:59:36 UTC  

That's a decent opinion to hold

2020-01-07 20:59:41 UTC  

Well, then what happens is that it ceases being a theory and becomes philosophy @Metallica

2020-01-07 20:59:42 UTC  

I understand why you'd think that

2020-01-07 20:59:46 UTC  

Most Western religion is going to be making metaphysical claims, so it's inherently philosophical in nature

2020-01-07 20:59:55 UTC  

This is actually what happened to Quantum Entanglement for a time

2020-01-07 21:00:17 UTC  

I think in general people also use too narrow of a definition for philosophy

2020-01-07 21:00:29 UTC  

Yes but QE was proved

2020-01-07 21:00:40 UTC  

It was, when a way to prove it was determined

2020-01-07 21:00:43 UTC  

But that took 50 years

2020-01-07 21:00:46 UTC  

Yes

2020-01-07 21:01:24 UTC  

And it was well after the death of both people who headed each argument.

2020-01-07 21:01:33 UTC  

So, without a way to prove one side right or wrong in the interim...

2020-01-07 21:01:36 UTC  

It became philosophy

2020-01-07 21:01:45 UTC  

That is how it is supposed to work, at the least.

2020-01-07 21:02:05 UTC  

It isn't a demeaning statement either, it just is acknowledging we lack a way to prove it at present.

2020-01-07 21:03:00 UTC  

But yes, on my previous point, if you wanted to and had the resources you could launch a rocket into space right now.

2020-01-07 21:03:07 UTC  

Or at least high enough to see curvature

2020-01-07 21:03:18 UTC  

35km should suffice for that, either way.

2020-01-07 21:04:02 UTC  

The everyday person isn't going to have the resources for it

2020-01-07 21:04:19 UTC  

An everyday person at present doesn't go to space.

2020-01-07 21:04:46 UTC  

At present?