Message from @Drewski4343
Discord ID: 666681459414663221
It isn't a claim of nothing
That's just a misrepresentation
We all know we can't dismiss stuff just because there is no evidence
It is normally dismissed due to other reasons
If it doesn't follow mainstream science it doesn't really make sense
So it isn't accepted
scientist admit they don't know the cause of it but at some point there should've been one right?
Quantum fluctuations could be one explanation
absence of proof is not proof of absence
True
Very true
absense of disproof is not proof of presence
HAH!
ban
Bruh
Wot wos dat fo mate?
Ban
Bruh
Whatever came before the BB was timeless and lawless. It's impossible to know for sure. But a whole universe-worth of energy was gathered at a single point and, for some reason, was quickly translated into matter, bound with physical laws that allow for the support of life. I think that's wonderful.
Its because it got to hot and exploded m8
That's why, huh?
hey @Drewski4343 . can you remind me again why we never see stars in any NASA videos?
Because the lights mate
bcs I found a high alt balloon clip and the stars look fine
@He Cute Correct
like why can't the ISS just have a second camera streaming the stars? <:thinking2:661792617180168222>
oh yes! exposure. The exposure is usually set to properly light the earth's surface, which will darken the sky and dim-by-comparison stars.
why would they
bcs it would look amazing. why do you think they put telescopes where they put them
above the atmosphere
no light interference
don't be stupid
it wouldnt really
Nah theres light all around it
just use the nighttime telescope streams
it's like when I ask why we don't have a camera on the moon streaming the earth
"why would they want to "
lol