Message from @.sam
Discord ID: 666680938993942544
equally as interesting is that religiosity is hereditary
No
We don’t want your children, filthy human
the whole argument of atheist is that since you can't prove god, he doesn't exist
The big bang isn't "nothing than something" it is the furthest point we can see and where the singularity happened
No one knows what causes it but something *had* to cause it
What must i do for this torment to end oh great meta
It isn't a claim of nothing
That's just a misrepresentation
We all know we can't dismiss stuff just because there is no evidence
It is normally dismissed due to other reasons
If it doesn't follow mainstream science it doesn't really make sense
So it isn't accepted
scientist admit they don't know the cause of it but at some point there should've been one right?
Quantum fluctuations could be one explanation
absence of proof is not proof of absence
True
Very true
absense of disproof is not proof of presence
ban
Bruh
Wot wos dat fo mate?
Ban
Bruh
Whatever came before the BB was timeless and lawless. It's impossible to know for sure. But a whole universe-worth of energy was gathered at a single point and, for some reason, was quickly translated into matter, bound with physical laws that allow for the support of life. I think that's wonderful.
And I sorta like to think could allow for the existence of a God.
Its because it got to hot and exploded m8
That's why, huh?
hey @Drewski4343 . can you remind me again why we never see stars in any NASA videos?
Because the lights mate
bcs I found a high alt balloon clip and the stars look fine
@He Cute Correct
like why can't the ISS just have a second camera streaming the stars? <:thinking2:661792617180168222>
oh yes! exposure. The exposure is usually set to properly light the earth's surface, which will darken the sky and dim-by-comparison stars.
why would they
bcs it would look amazing. why do you think they put telescopes where they put them
above the atmosphere
no light interference