Message from @Flat Earth PhD
Discord ID: 667730001118101539
I can prove it.
@Stalin the Incredible ozi bro tell em
Give me permissions to post pictures or something
no
Why, you get to post bullshit and I don't?
you have to earn it.
once we confirm you are legit
and not just a troll
I'm a legit bagel earther
and so far it's not looking so good
too bad. another lost soul
ye
he could have learned so much
but chose the blue pill
Bennnnnnnny in the VC claims to have seen curvature out a aeroplane window, an that mass attracts mass because downward acceleration an meh grabbity 😄
Literally nothing you guys posted was bullshit.
as I always say....flat earthers are the scientists. heliocentrists are the religious ones. oh the irony...
That mirror image is photoshopped
It looks like it
@Wasted i never understood what was proven by that test
@Riska most pictures are photoshopped
flatties use them just as much as globers
but flat earth is the baseline
earth is flat until its proven otherwise
The bedford canal experiment doesn't prove flath earth
It does not take account of atmospheric refraction. In fact experiments have been carried out on the same stretch of canal that prove the Earth is a globe.
The difference between the two experiments was the height at which the sight line was made. When close to the water there is line of sight along all six miles. When thirteen feet (4m) above the water, the curvature was evident and a pole at the halfway point was obviously higher than the line of sight.
It is common for the atmospheric refraction to exactly cancel the curvature of the Earth, especially over water where there may be expected to be a temperature inversion. Other such experiments have “proved” that the Earth is concave. Of course it is not necessary to have the two effects exactly cancel in order to prove the simple presence of a line-of-sight.
See: Bedford Level experiment - Wikipedia
That link also discounts the popular rule of thumb of 8 inches of dip per mile. It gives it as 8 inches the first mile, a total 32 after the second and 72 after the third.
See anything wrong with this picture, Claire?
Ok . Yes. You debunked this one. I might've picked the wrong image.