Message from @Regular Waterfowl

Discord ID: 668231753051144212


2020-01-18 22:57:12 UTC  

Please provide a scientific experiment that proves gravity
Either mass attracting mass or bending of space time

2020-01-18 22:57:20 UTC  

Scientific method is crucial

2020-01-18 22:57:23 UTC  

cavendish

2020-01-18 22:57:35 UTC  

Cavendish is not an experiment nor does it follow the scientific experiment

2020-01-18 22:57:44 UTC  

why not

2020-01-18 22:57:45 UTC  

Cavendish is a observation of a effect

2020-01-18 22:58:24 UTC  

well.. jeah you have to observe an effect, if you dont observe an effect nothing happened

2020-01-18 22:58:44 UTC  

Of course
But it doesn’t make it a experiment

2020-01-18 22:59:15 UTC  

Cause it proves nothing
It is an observation
It would be awesome if somebody conducted it in a vacuum too

2020-01-18 22:59:27 UTC  

uhm think they

2020-01-18 22:59:31 UTC  

are doing it

2020-01-18 22:59:42 UTC  

or it is beeing done

2020-01-18 23:00:25 UTC  

Show me pls

2020-01-18 23:03:59 UTC  

cant find a video, why would have atmosphere have an impact on that tough. if you can make a bunch of experiments using the same kind of setup and find that a non ferrus object with mass will ALWAYSmove towards another object with the same/similar properties?

2020-01-18 23:04:33 UTC  

Thxxxx

2020-01-18 23:06:06 UTC  

ok, but why aren't observing effects the result of an experiment? like, in the video, the laser didn't bend with the curve of the earth, and that's an effect, right?

2020-01-18 23:11:11 UTC  

if you make an experiment. you try to observe an effect. if you for exampe perform an experiment to determin if things even fall to the ground by holding something in your hand and then letting go of it, it doesnt matter if you observe it or not, it will fall to the ground. if you are in a zero G envoirement you would observe that the object you let go of does not drop anywhwere and stays in the position where you let it go.

2020-01-18 23:12:47 UTC  

@California Nightmare 3.0 it's not an ad hominem. It's a given fact that people who don't take basic classes on a topic inherently don't understand it as well as someone who does.

2020-01-18 23:13:34 UTC  

On a side note, it seems that people here like to accuse others of using an ad hominem as an excuse to not argue their point.

2020-01-18 23:13:50 UTC  

When justifying an ad hominem

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484516084846952451/668231606783180800/image0.png

2020-01-18 23:14:25 UTC  

There you go again

2020-01-18 23:14:30 UTC  

That's an ad hominem

2020-01-18 23:14:44 UTC  

Directed against me, not my argument

2020-01-18 23:15:13 UTC  

K
Hippo crip 🙂

2020-01-18 23:15:19 UTC  

Lmao

2020-01-18 23:16:42 UTC  

<:BigGrin:507986757753634826>

2020-01-18 23:17:16 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484516084846952451/668232472353308716/1547218992927.jpg

2020-01-18 23:17:17 UTC  

"this server is for research and friends, not to mock others" it says in <#484513575801454593>
Seems like you are in complete violation of that, as are most people in here

2020-01-18 23:18:03 UTC  

@Regular Waterfowl pretty much

2020-01-18 23:18:45 UTC  

Believe it or not, I've been told I'm not allowed to ask certain questions in this server

2020-01-18 23:18:52 UTC  

cope

2020-01-18 23:19:26 UTC  

I cold replace that with "round Earth is stupid" and "here take this old book"

2020-01-18 23:19:45 UTC  

Or "here take fake science"

2020-01-18 23:20:03 UTC  

@nan highly doubt *france* had a pope 😄

2020-01-18 23:20:15 UTC  

@Flat Earth PhD did you do you moom experiment yet?

2020-01-18 23:20:17 UTC  
2020-01-18 23:20:18 UTC  

moon*

2020-01-18 23:20:59 UTC  

what moon experiment?

2020-01-18 23:21:09 UTC  

moon light temp.

2020-01-18 23:21:18 UTC  

no not yet