@Amthyric Tbh, I don’t think I can explain that any easier than I could tidal nodes.

@Amthyric stop pinging me or i'll fix it for you

@Derek Nelson explain it any way you can

Citizen, this is zero hour

...

no need to warn me

I require more information to even form a hypothesis.

ok

@Derek Nelson so there is no standard FE model?

No model of any kind is 100% accurate.

what about geotomography?

No flat earth model.... yikes

We can map unground features

We need to standardize a proper flat earth model

Could say the same about the globe earth model. Where you guys can’t make up your minds about Antarctica’s size.

Then it can sufficiently convince people

The reason why they have no agreed model is because every single one doesnt make sense

Produce an accurate one

@Derek Nelson please focus on this conversation

Ez.

Do you reject all geotomography?

what about plate tectonics?

See, thats the beauty of the globe earth. We have an accurate model that can actually predict things

Plate tectonics are a theory.

yes

a unifying model

high predictive power

And predictions on a flat earth are just as easily made.

We observe.

what prediction can you make on a flat earth?

lmao

It has nothing to do with the earth’s shape.

@Derek Nelson but we have a problem

Yes it does, the FE cannot predict any stellar movement

why do we see faults where they exist?

and why do plates move?

Because you dont even believe orbiting bodies LOL

I think you can only know the truth if you have been both a globe earther and a flat earther, and you have genuinely believed in both.

This allows unbiased comparison

dude, the truth is simple.