Message from @Flat Earth PhD
Discord ID: 673479816921481267
in fact....water is more accurate at determining level than a laser
um waves
level. not flat
Lol'd at the pic @Derek Nelson posted because while the biggest LITERAL hole we digged was 7,6 miles, we have more than just our eyes. We have our ears as well. There is more than just one way to figure out what's beneath the earth
Dude
water is always level. Earth is >70% water. Earth is level surfaced
@Flat Earth PhD level doesn't mean flat. Watch this videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDy95_eNPzM&t=236s and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyD8VIK032o&list=PLybg94GvOJ9GEuq4mp9ruJpj-rjKQ_a6E&index=2
The fact you said ‘observe’, when you in fact can’t see anything beneath 8 miles, is the very definition of disingenuous.
water level more accurate than a laser
You realise that putting two tubes 20 centimeters apart doesnt prove your point
how about 30miles
100 miles
it's always level
That would Show a little bit
did someone do that?
nobody said anything about 20 cm
I could try that maybe
"Observe" means to "percieve", and you can "perceive" with more than just your eyes. Your tongue is a good example. Or your ears. Or your nose. Just to name a few @Derek Nelson
If i had 2 powerfull lasers or something
Observe with our eyes. Our sight, is the arguing point.
If you are going to reject both your ears and nose and only accept your eyes yours not only metaphorically deaf but literally as well
how can you use any of those below 8 miles if we've never drilled that far?
you can't
end of argument
Stop blabbering semantics. You were caught using the wrong word, and now you’re trying to worm your way out of it.
Yeah cause stuff starts melting there
move on or get muted
You realise that
** this is not a debate channel **
They couldnt dig further cause the drill started to melt
@Derek Nelson How was it the wrong word? According to Webster dictionary, to "observe" is the same thing as to "percieve"
^
@windmill man Okay. Let’s do it your way. I saw your mom naked. With my ears. (Make sense? Nope. And neither does your argument when you use the wrong words.)
Stop bullshitting. You don’t use the word observe, when you’re reading a graph.
@Derek Nelson You could hear my mom, with your ears, and therefore conclude that my mom is nearby, because you could hear her. In that way, you have used reasoning to "perceive" my mom
Now let's say she was naked, and that she is in fact able to see you. She would probably make a different sound than she would if she had clothes on
Try using a proper phrase. ‘We theorize that we have measured earth movement with seismographs.’ (Using the phrase, ‘we have observed earth movement with seismographs’, is a straight up lie.
Eat your crow.
Is this you conceding? Not sure where you wanted to move with your hypothesis