What does that prove

so is water

No

water is not always straight

in fact....water is more accurate at determining level than a laser

um waves

level. not flat

Lol'd at the pic @Derek Nelson posted because while the biggest LITERAL hole we digged was 7,6 miles, we have more than just our eyes. We have our ears as well. There is more than just one way to figure out what's beneath the earth

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_level_(device)

Dude

water is always level. Earth is >70% water. Earth is level surfaced

@Flat Earth PhD level doesn't mean flat. Watch this videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDy95_eNPzM&t=236s and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyD8VIK032o&list=PLybg94GvOJ9GEuq4mp9ruJpj-rjKQ_a6E&index=2

The fact you said ‘observe’, when you in fact can’t see anything beneath 8 miles, is the very definition of disingenuous.

water level more accurate than a laser

You realise that putting two tubes 20 centimeters apart doesnt prove your point

how about 30miles

100 miles

it's always level

That would Show a little bit

did someone do that?

nobody said anything about 20 cm

I could try that maybe

"Observe" means to "percieve", and you can "perceive" with more than just your eyes. Your tongue is a good example. Or your ears. Or your nose. Just to name a few @Derek Nelson

If i had 2 powerfull lasers or something

omg

Observe with our eyes. Our sight, is the arguing point.

If you are going to reject both your ears and nose and only accept your eyes yours not only metaphorically deaf but literally as well

how can you use any of those below 8 miles if we've never drilled that far?

you can't

end of argument

Stop blabbering semantics. You were caught using the wrong word, and now you’re trying to worm your way out of it.

Yeah cause stuff starts melting there

move on or get muted

You realise that

** this is not a debate channel **

They couldnt dig further cause the drill started to melt

@Derek Nelson How was it the wrong word? According to Webster dictionary, to "observe" is the same thing as to "percieve"

^

@windmill man Okay. Let’s do it your way. I saw your mom naked. With my ears. (Make sense? Nope. And neither does your argument when you use the wrong words.)

Stop bullshitting. You don’t use the word observe, when you’re reading a graph.

@Derek Nelson You could hear my mom, with your ears, and therefore conclude that my mom is nearby, because you could hear her. In that way, you have used reasoning to "perceive" my mom