They don’t.

In fact, nobody can really explain it, without making the assumption that either the company they work for has the ability to see in the future, OR, they already knew the earth is flat too, and they are controlled op.

ok, I never asked. if you don't watch my evidence, then I can't have an arguement with you.

Point is, you’re trying to use people who are in fact shills to make your argument.

Holy crap, is that you nelson

Hmm?

ok

earth is flat - flat earthers

what evidence supports it

thats the only reasons why

what

do you want me to explain the first picture you posted

i can explain most of the stuff and why it doesnt prove the earth is flat

I’m not interested in listening to your wild explanations that require imagination, and ignore tangible, verifiable, and repeatable proof.

why

they arent "wild explanations"

Because I’ve heard it already.

so you are being ignorant on purpose without me actually saying it yet

!mute <@417439359868862465>

<:XMARK6:403540169992568833> You cannot mute someone already muted.

i can explain it in my own way if you want

or you can tell me what arguments youve heard against what you believe so i dont repeat the same stuff

Your explanations don’t meet the requirements of proof.

but they would

if you let me explain

more like evidence

Saying you can disprove something, when you don’t operate by the method to achieve it to begin with, is a serious problem.

why does thunder need to bounce off anything

or sound at that

all it needs is a medium to travel through

i havent even told you why that picture is wrong and you are saying im wrong

wtf

You can produce an echo with a medium that doesn’t have a solid barrier?

@Superiorna_Artiljerija