Message from @Logrian

Discord ID: 677195331586359347


2020-02-12 16:06:37 UTC  

show us

2020-02-12 16:07:51 UTC  

watch the first 30 seconds of that video

2020-02-12 16:08:01 UTC  

and listen to it

2020-02-12 16:08:09 UTC  

it proves no motion

2020-02-12 16:10:45 UTC  

the guy in the first video said, you cant measure any precession using a mechanical gyroscope no matter what you do with it didnt he?

2020-02-12 16:11:00 UTC  

you dont understand

2020-02-12 16:11:07 UTC  

you wont even watch

2020-02-12 16:13:16 UTC  

i am watching it right now

2020-02-12 16:21:12 UTC  

hmm so this doesnt tell me much. could you even measure earth rotation using the gyroscope he used? from your perspective if it was spinning? because a gyro like this will just stay on the same tilt that you put it down right?

2020-02-12 16:23:14 UTC  

it will hold to a point, if the earth rotates the original point held will move 15 degrees per hjour, this isnt observed

2020-02-12 16:26:25 UTC  

only quote i found on that matter right now ''
Mechanical gyroscopes

For an observer at the surface of the Earth, the Coriolis force would be responsible of moving the gyroscope axis of rotation. It is well-known that this force is weak on small system, by which I mean it is easily overwhelmed by non-inertial forces such as friction, viscosity, etc. This is why Foucault pendulums have to be sizeable (the smallest I am aware of has a string about 5 meters long). Thus I reckon you would need a gyroscope way bigger than the mass-produced ones. I am not aware of any purpose-built gyroscope to test Coriolis forces. But why would anybody bother when it is so much easier to build a Foucault pendulum? ''

2020-02-12 16:30:27 UTC  

i hope you understand now, this is one of many FE proofs

2020-02-12 16:30:32 UTC  

as is the black swan

2020-02-12 16:30:34 UTC  

an many others

2020-02-12 16:43:24 UTC  

that quote is in oposition to the mechanical gyro having to move because earth rotation tough?

2020-02-12 16:43:52 UTC  

as i say one of many proofs

2020-02-12 16:44:45 UTC  

wich isnt a proof?

2020-02-12 16:46:47 UTC  

to you who are blinded no

2020-02-12 16:52:19 UTC  

did you watch the video i posted logrian

2020-02-12 16:52:28 UTC  

ye

2020-02-12 16:52:32 UTC  

its been debunked

2020-02-12 16:52:35 UTC  

like eaons ago

2020-02-12 16:52:48 UTC  

that was poasted like a week ago

2020-02-12 16:53:56 UTC  

op nevermind

2020-02-12 16:54:08 UTC  

nope

2020-02-12 16:54:21 UTC  

2018 july an 2019 july

2020-02-12 16:58:10 UTC  

did you see what i just typed

2020-02-12 16:58:39 UTC  

noi

2020-02-12 17:03:40 UTC  

ha

2020-02-12 17:06:37 UTC  

are nukes real?

2020-02-12 17:11:09 UTC  

noi

2020-02-12 17:11:57 UTC  

what are you kidding me

2020-02-12 17:12:09 UTC  

They are real

2020-02-12 17:12:45 UTC  

there were over 2000 explosions during the 1900s

2020-02-12 17:13:14 UTC  

explasions are one thing

2020-02-12 17:13:25 UTC  

but faking an ultimate waepons another

2020-02-12 17:13:37 UTC  

and the were two nuclear explosiomns that killed thousands

2020-02-12 17:13:40 UTC  

so they just used tnt?

2020-02-12 17:13:42 UTC  

Not to mention the recorded **Nuclear** fallout and radiation that follows.

2020-02-12 17:13:45 UTC  

sry its long