its not a globe, that modal is dead

theyve no evidence

if there was we wouldnt be FErs

you just have an incredibly high standard of evidence when it comes to the globe model while a very low one for flat earth thats all it is

theres is NO evidence for a globe

thats the issue

for flat earth jeah

we can all buy gyroscopes an prove a motionless earth

oh like bob or whatever his name was?

with the ring laser gyro

that proved 15 degree per hour drift?

that is a lie

a mechanical gyroscope proves a flat motionless earth

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/667075565655949372/677190444215435323/image0.jpg

try it yourself

film it an upload it

show us

watch the first 30 seconds of that video

and listen to it

it proves no motion

https://youtu.be/deoLBQTtXJw?t=642

the guy in the first video said, you cant measure any precession using a mechanical gyroscope no matter what you do with it didnt he?

you dont understand

you wont even watch

i am watching it right now

hmm so this doesnt tell me much. could you even measure earth rotation using the gyroscope he used? from your perspective if it was spinning? because a gyro like this will just stay on the same tilt that you put it down right?

it will hold to a point, if the earth rotates the original point held will move 15 degrees per hjour, this isnt observed

only quote i found on that matter right now ''
Mechanical gyroscopes

For an observer at the surface of the Earth, the Coriolis force would be responsible of moving the gyroscope axis of rotation. It is well-known that this force is weak on small system, by which I mean it is easily overwhelmed by non-inertial forces such as friction, viscosity, etc. This is why Foucault pendulums have to be sizeable (the smallest I am aware of has a string about 5 meters long). Thus I reckon you would need a gyroscope way bigger than the mass-produced ones. I am not aware of any purpose-built gyroscope to test Coriolis forces. But why would anybody bother when it is so much easier to build a Foucault pendulum? ''

i hope you understand now, this is one of many FE proofs

as is the black swan

an many others

that quote is in oposition to the mechanical gyro having to move because earth rotation tough?

as i say one of many proofs

wich isnt a proof?

to you who are blinded no

did you watch the video i posted logrian

ye

its been debunked

like eaons ago

that was poasted like a week ago

op nevermind