Message from @Citizen Z
Discord ID: 679544785987436650
Im tending to side with him
@Citizen Z So argument still stands, we're constantly accelerating
Most likely in a circle, which would avoid the speed of light issue
when you get a solid acceleration rate in multiple places let me know
Do you claim otherwise?
Hasn't varied at all everywhere I've been
Im saying just let me know
Ok I just did
It's the same everywhere I've been
Ok cool
Bug off
This feeling you have right now @Citizen Z
It's called cognitive dissonance
It makes you unable to think straight, come up with any responses, and get frustrated enough to tell someone to go away
Why not rethink what your position is, since it fails?
Lol
White as my neighborhood
@Hedwig#1687 gravity hills
Your precious acceleration
Doesnt work out
gravity hills are an illusion
Are we talking about using lorentz EM theory instead of special relativity?????
What if space has charge but no mass it would also have ev mass
not necessarily
+ or - or 0?
-1/2 +1/2
Space as mass and volume as Ev's
To replace inside of G = kms2
6.6x10 ev/time
E/T
Crap
Thanks
G has units of FL^2/M
lorents EM theory isnt equal to relativity
but it is consistent with it
I just want one equation is so much to ask for
Like for g = but for dt but dt is constant change in time just like how air resistance is proportional to velocity