yes it was a volcanic eruption

but how does some guy know it was 60 years ago

which formed the rocks 60 years ago but they still show to be million of years ago

that is literally not how rocks work

carbon dating is an extremely long process, if it were 60 years old it would contain the exact amount of carbon as a rock 5 minutes old

ok bitch boy then why didn't it show that it was 5 minutes old?

Rude

there is a slight bit of curvature on the real photo and it seems the right amount especially for that altitude

when a globetard doesn't know what a fisheye lens is

I know what a fisheye lens is

@He Cute It was just an example. We can't know the exact age of a rock of course so it's estimated with give or take a million or so years. A rock a million years ago might have the same amount of carbon as 5 minutes ago (except rocks literally dont form magically). Carbon dating takes a whole

you better cut that attitude aswell boy god doesnt like pride so I am told

@Logrian The top one is clearly a much higher altitude

you can't see curvature on an airplane which is 35k feet in the air but you can at 8k? nice logic bro

well then the one at 8k kilometres hasnt been completely corrected because there is still curvature

Is the bottom 8k I'm confused

hi does anyone have the image showing the map of flat earth

Because it looks much much higher

where every direction is south going outward

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/434357880981028875/680158288188669962/unknown.png

atleast my model is real

proven a fiction

RIP Globe

the flat earth model is way more complicated and literally has so many contradictions, stretches of logic and fairytale nonsense

You can't prove either globe or flat real, but the globe has a million times more evidence

just what I was going to say chris

I love how when you guys are out of basic arguments you resort to facebook memes

Do you have like a folder of these you spit them out real quickly

Cause if you do thats pathetic