bro

just a heads up for everyone...trolling is not tolerated here.

"Enter at your own risk"

I'm not trolling

all i know is that refraction is some sciency stuff that was not accounted for when the poles were observed

Otherwise known would've have been going

!mute @I_NOOBz

@glime oh did you read the full study? how do you KNOW refraction wasn't accounted for?

i inferred based on the fact that it says wallace won the bet by accounting for refraction

thats all i really know

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkM6jd2vZ24

i guess i find this more intriguing

you can clearly see the boat sinking into the horizon

is this an illusion?

at some point you will never be able to see the object, regardless of magnification because of the decreasing angle of observation.

this shot would be impossible on a sphere of the size we were told

the horizon would have to be in front of the rigs. fullstop.

ball is toast

shouldnt those rigs appear to be sunken in the horizon?

???

based on the previous picture

the person walking away appears to sink

the one farther away is

it doesnt look obstructed to me

or I don't understand your question

is the rig that appears to be smaller, is it farther away?

yes

shouldnt it appear to be sunken like the guy walking away is?

no

i cant make out where the horizon line is in that picture

@-BigBB416 - can i be unmuted

I have a question

@Chris | Flat Earther

I have a question

obviously you are not muted <a:SAFacepalmAnim:675037589983723542>

i meant vc muted

then don't post here. wrong channel. if they decide not to unmute, it's for a good reason