sorry

no worries

You trust engineering, yes?

happens a lot

yes

And engineering uses gravity, yes?

@Trixxle you were going to work out the geometric horizon using your maths an draw it in yellow, remember?

we should get some geodesist for questioning 😄

what I'm still trying to figure out is why some globers spend so much time here every day

curious

i dont think engineers care about bending of spacetime man

why do they care so very much

Morbid fascination

lol

right

you guys ever tried breathwork?

@Logrian here you go sir

I don't understand why youre trying to make me do

<:confused:625494374402228244>

Engineers, evidently, do use gravity quite a lot, depending on the specific application. Certain nuances of it also rely quite heavily on aspects of relativistic motion as well, so I guess the answer is 'yes'.

Trix, earlier you said that was the refracted horizon, well which is it, because you said from you maths the horizon from one foot is 6 miles and that past ten miles, im confused?

That mountain image is a bit fishy with the numbers

If you put the obs and target heights into the curve calculator you get results similar to the image. With/Without refraction

I have taken picture of what I mean from my screen but cant post them

post now

Sorry they're not screenshots

There we go. Been a long day

how is this simulation similar to the image? the horizon should appear after the structure not vanish before

I don't follow?

@Pit Droid the red and yellow structure is platform habitat correct? the image taken for black swan shows platform habitat appearing before the horizon but in your simulation, the structure appear to vanish after the horizon

Ahh no this is the mountain image not the rigs

oh right, then thats a different matter

@Logrian ah yes, cause I can clearly see how far the line is I drew

And the refractors horizon is the horizon we see

That's what I was referring to