1.98155273 miles an yet we see ten miles

https://youtu.be/ieRT2k08A08?t=502

your maths said 1.9 miles

we se ten miles

its a fact XD

If you are curious...

This is actually the incorrect way to write that equation.

It ends up being non-functioning in more than one way, due to how it is written.

Here's a more accurate process.

For two elevated objects, at least.

d is not precisely the same as a value of I, for example.

More precisely, I'd recommend using the derived and more succinct form of sqrt(2Rh) + h^2

🐍 Sci-Fi/Satanism...Gone in 60 seconds 🕵
https://youtu.be/oGuEMG5Cnyw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEIk7gwjgIM

why don't they ever set the exposure where you can see the stars?

ah too much cgi work

Because you'd blow out the surface of the earth. Can't have it both ways, unfortunately.

earth is flat

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMmcyFbVrlo

@Saturn given that formuli you wish to use wheres the Geometric Horizon at one foot/30cms observer height then?

@Drewski4343 but they could have another camera

Sure, but I'm looking at it from their (supposed) point of view - they're not there to take shots of the stars. To them it doesn't matter if they're in the shots or not. They're not trying to disprove the flat earth myth of why stars can't be seen, they're just trying to make sure the surface of the earth is exposed properly.

Yes