btw, u know the picture a satalyte takes, well, its made up of many pictures, because all of our satalytes are too close to earth

so, i just ignore those pictures. too many possible mistakes you can make there xD

but, if u think it could make a difference, I'll keep an open mind for ya

oml, looking at those images are making me laugh xD

they're so distorted!

i understand that taking close-ups of a celestial body is hard, but i can't believe that's official xD

Gravity is unproven

And so is everything u learned

eh, science is based off of best guesses

but its the most accurate guess

ooo my cousins are here!

cya'll later 😁

That’s not science...
@TheSilverFox101

Science is based off of the scientific method

Anything that is provable using the scientific method
Observation>Hypothesis>Experiment

@IXI The continent size thing is well explained:

@Logrian Any thoughts/rephrasement of your question from last night of "How much limit of refraction?"

Also your angular resolution argument for bottom-up disappearance is incorrect. Assuming it is correct, it also implies visual effects not seen.

so much editing......pity we can't get just some actual photos <a:BlobThinkos:683883001989300254>

but the trolls/agents will always have some silly explanations. in fact that's why they are here. to keep up to date with what we uncover....so they can generate the cover story

luckily we are always one step ahead

Oh please

"All of these things are explained! Those fools!" What kind of logic is that?

@Pit Droid explain the identical clouds

Clouds on a mosaic image are edited by necessity, else it'll look like garbage. Heck, sometimes the cloud gets imaged twice by the orbiting satellite anyway. This has been explained by the people who construct these images many times.

The blue marble images use a cloud pattern constructed from seperate data to the land images. It's just cloud pasted into a cloudless map and made 3d. You can even download the cloud map used. It gets re-used a few times.

You couldve just said cgi and summarized my point

Like I said....always a silly explanation

apparently cameras don't work in space. but then.... that moon landing <a:BlobThinkos:683883001989300254>

You're calling an edited photo edited...which was already known to be edited...in order to claim it is edited....

how many rockets...."probes"...have supposedly left Earth?

not one actual photograph? or video

please

Literslly tons of footage if you take the .3 seconds to look it up. .

give up

6yrs

How in 6 years have you not read any of this stuff?