but doesn't matter

I will never likely be able to confirm myself.

I care more about how far we can see objects

trying to measure curvature

because I cannot find a single paper in a peer-reviewed journal showing direct measurement of Earth's curvature

otherwise I could read the Materials & Methods section and replicate.

yeah i also tried looking

they are hard to find

!rank

<:XMARK6:403540169992568833> **Speedy**, this command is disabled in this channel

I even spent a week trying to find studies involving microgravity that cited the ISS in the Methods section.

using CSI

found only a couple and it was only involving samples that supposedly spent time in the ISS

I found that odd given they are supposedly doing hundreds of experiments up there...if so...where are the thousands of papers that should be coming out of that

@Flat Earth PhD https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/funder/nasa/

this is a search engine for nasa's research

yeah NASA is already a discredited witness

I prefer to search using conventional science citation search indexes

that's how I approached it originally

it uses pmc

I can use PMC directly

or SCI

I don't need a filter for "NASA funded"

but it doesn't matter now. I'm 100% sure the ISS is on Earth

this was back when I was a glober and doing my own research

im pretty sure you can see it with a telescope

at the right time

seeing something doesn't mean anything

??

it means you saw something. unless you saw people through the window waving at you

I don't buy it

sorry

but you are free to

way too much evidence debunking it for me

and too little supporting it

but you have to come to your own conclusion

if it was a really good telescope that you saw it through and it was clearly a spacestation would you then believe it

no. I can see the moon. and it's not a solid object

what about the humans that get launched into space. and return months/years later

how do you know there is any human on any rocket that has ever gone up?

like these folks?