Message from @Flat Earth PhD
Discord ID: 688162445616742449
Please
Nuclear
I get the refraction on Selenelion, but the top-down eclipse on the moon is the strangest part.
Make a scale man
One that makes sense
Wow, at first it sounded like the amount of refraction would be too great, but the light rays would only need to refract by about 0.938° in total between the sun and moon's light rays,which seems reasonable given the angle of incidence
What is the argument and who is the flat earther
And who is the glove earther
Globe*
I've no idea, I'm just discussing the selenelion
Oh I thought you were disagreeing
Lol
I still don't quite understand what's meant by top-down eclipse on the moon, or if it means what I think it means, then how is it relevant?
eclipses are not relevant to the shape of Earth's surface
Well if an eclipse is observed which is impossible in the globe model wouldn't that debunk it?
if you shoot a laser 30miles across a lake and find no curvature? no
just because you don't understand HOW something works, doesn't mean that it doesn't
Why do we see ships disappear
New meme well look at that. Earth is a pancake
nobody said it was a disk
Just because one doesn't match it directly means it's wrong??
That's a logical fallacy
👍
stay with the spinning ball
I think it suits you
👍
Nice response.
Very conflicting results
They always stop when they lose
Imagine if the FECore laser was mounted on the lower levels of that vessel, according to this video, it would not be visible. So either atmospheric conditions are heavily influencing the results, or one of them is invalid
They won't admit that.