Wow, at first it sounded like the amount of refraction would be too great, but the light rays would only need to refract by about 0.938° in total between the sun and moon's light rays,which seems reasonable given the angle of incidence

What is the argument and who is the flat earther

And who is the glove earther

Globe*

I've no idea, I'm just discussing the selenelion

Oh I thought you were disagreeing

Lol

I still don't quite understand what's meant by top-down eclipse on the moon, or if it means what I think it means, then how is it relevant?

eclipses are not relevant to the shape of Earth's surface

Well if an eclipse is observed which is impossible in the globe model wouldn't that debunk it?

if you shoot a laser 30miles across a lake and find no curvature? no

just because you don't understand HOW something works, doesn't mean that it doesn't

Why do we see ships disappear

they don't disappear. if you have a telephoto lens

New meme well look at that. Earth is a pancake

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ql_TTguKxnE

nobody said it was a disk

Just because one doesn't match it directly means it's wrong??

That's a logical fallacy

👍

stay with the spinning ball

I think it suits you

https://youtu.be/3_TpeNZYTmw

👍

Nice response.

Very conflicting results

They always stop when they lose

Imagine if the FECore laser was mounted on the lower levels of that vessel, according to this video, it would not be visible. So either atmospheric conditions are heavily influencing the results, or one of them is invalid

They won't admit that.

we don't care what others believe.

we just try to lead horses to water

it's up to them at that point

nobody can change your mind but you

Yeah, I agree.

we were all the same as you at one point