damn aladdin smh my head

wasn't he on some CIA watch list?

*”When theft could no longer pay the rent Aladdin turn to ISIS.”*

based aladdin

based aladdin

Could you keep the conversation serious please? Thank you.

@Koninos Oh come on, we’re just having a little fun.

Risen you can always mute him

before he mutes you

so he can't do the command

fast before he sees

Yea lighten up a little

You can have some fun in <#587015719141507102>, so it'd be better if you just take it there.

***scrambles for mute button***

I don't want to piss off the admins

In all seriousness Konino has got a point. Sober up or move it out guys.

Everyone who wants to #bomb Aladdin go to <#587015719141507102>

Boring stays here

Libertarianism>>>>>

no

Aslong as I ain't harming anyone, it's no one else's business what I do

justify that please

Why does harm have to be the only criteria for forceful involvement by a third party?

Also, what kind of harm are we talking about?

Physical, exploitation, sexual ect

Why does harm have to be the only criteria for forceful involvement by a third party?

Physical harm is still very vague, but I will accept it for the sake of the argument

What other criteria should there be

Well you made the claim

I'm asking you to back it up

BC if I ain't directly hurting someone without their consent, it's no one's business what I do. I should have no right to go into someone's bedroom and tell them who to fuck, what they should put in their body ect

Moreover, the state is responsible for so much evil

"who cares what I do? I'm not hurting anyone!"

So what you've just done is simply reiterated the claim "force should be the only criteria for direct forceful involment" into "because im not hurting anyone"
I'm asking why does the fact that you hurt someone have to be the only criteria of direct involvement, you cannot just respond to that request with merely reiterating your original claim

its like saying "all that breaths should be killed"
"Why"
"Because if you breath you should be killed"

that doesn't address the question in any way lol

Well do you think it's right for someone to come into your house and tell you what to do if what you're doing doesn't affect anyone

And when the state interfers in people's lives, it always does more bad than good

Look at the war on drugs

Or the war in the middle east

That's a false analogy fallacy. I wouldn't be in favor of that however i would not extrapolate that principle onto the state