Message from @Miriam
Discord ID: 690320839840759809
o
this is for you
BERNIE
!!
So in the 1970's Hitler is aged, has several health issues, and is trying to hold together the alliance that is the axis.
Turkey is under siege by islamists.
Franco is aged too.
I hadn't thought about Hitler yet tough I think by that time he would have appointed a successor.
The main focus would be in a pangermanic state.
that wet pussy
Mussolini is assassinated by partisan communists, but in his favor comes a young general to oversee this Italian empire.
when i touch that wet pussy
oh
it feels so good
mm
He is comparable to Caesar.
And, The Germans, Spanish, and Italians are at odds with each other. As is the British Fascist Puppet State under Mosely.
I think I also shifted some events as mirrors.
Like the Vietnam war being fought in Indonesia.
And the Soviets have violated their treaty and have been militarizing in the urals.
<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***Spicy#5985 has been warned., Stop NSFW content in a serious channel.***
The Soviets are biding their time to sweep up the remains of the axis if they declare war on each other.
Hitler, now very elderly and feeble, once a man of war, must be the man of peace.
And hold them together.
who's the worst man on earth?
So yeah, anyway I think that would be an interesting scenario as you pointed out.
nobody is the worst or best man on earth
there are some better than others
but nobody is truly bad and nobody is truly good
everyone has a character flaw
and everyone has something they are good at
worst means
more horribel
like a killer
to say that one person is good and one person is bad inherently impossible
ted bundy: he killed people but he helped people on the suicide hotline
sure what he is known for is bad but what he did on the side was good
and for psychopaths who killed a lot of people
like a 100
or more
so can you truly say that he is a terrible person? although he took more than 30 lives, he did save some lives
im not justifying murder