Message from @Maksim
Discord ID: 693930918640877651
So you'd agree to a 90% tax on the top bracket if the middle class is already powerful?
Let me explain why a 90% tax on the top bracket is not extreme
Not a 90%, but a 70% one, yes.
Someone who makes 10 billion, and is taxed 90% still has 1 billion
Yeah he’s frozen rent and they’re not going to have to pay it back, the tenants could not pay for two years and it wouldn’t be a huge financial stress luckily
Which is enough to live 50 lifetimes over
Mad respect
Your dad is a great man
Lol thank you, I’ll make sure to tell him but I doubt he’ll understand why a random person on the internet is saying so <:salute:671540174928478239>
Only, you didn't ask them what their spending is, nor what their revenue is.
Say that i feel like i personally know him
if you're a businessman, and your company is going to shit, one billion will not be enough to save your company from certain death.
So my respect isn't random
It is personal tax not corporate tax
Still stands.
You'd just send the wealthy away.
1940's and 50's prove otherwise
We're talking about implementation of such taxation systems in the 21st century.
Forget about the 1940's.
@Winston Smith will do 👌, thank you for the respect towards us teachers
It makes literally no difference
You'd lose revenue, obviously, no matter how significant it was.
Not enough to matter
And if you'd tax the top bracket so heavily, then at one point, after having all the wealthy ones leaving, the middle class would be the top bracket.
Except the 50's prove
And what, would you tax them 90% as well?
They dont leave
...
We're talking about implementation of such taxation systems in the 21st century.
Forget about the 1950's.
The 50's arent some ancient era
They are modern history
Because Trump's got a point on this one.
Tax cuts for the wealthy brought in more companies.
Yes okay thank you for enlightening me, I didn't know that the 50's were modern history.
Trump himself admitted his tax breaks backfired, because giving tax cuts to them leave them to be greedy
Only, there's so far away from the 2020's.
You have to force them to spend it in the correct
And hence irrelevant to the 21st century.
way
At that point