Message from @Koninos

Discord ID: 693930733080936459


2020-03-29 21:09:40 UTC  

Because you'd all out of sudden lose a shit ton of money and wouldn't be able to provide them.

2020-03-29 21:09:42 UTC  

How is he dealing with the pandemic? Is he allowing people to not pay rent? @Oliver

2020-03-29 21:09:45 UTC  

Beforehand, yes.

2020-03-29 21:09:51 UTC  

Yet again, a 90% tax is extreme.

2020-03-29 21:09:56 UTC  

Because you need the wealthy.

2020-03-29 21:10:05 UTC  

So you'd agree to a 90% tax on the top bracket if the middle class is already powerful?

2020-03-29 21:10:24 UTC  

Let me explain why a 90% tax on the top bracket is not extreme

2020-03-29 21:10:25 UTC  

Not a 90%, but a 70% one, yes.

2020-03-29 21:10:38 UTC  

Someone who makes 10 billion, and is taxed 90% still has 1 billion

2020-03-29 21:10:42 UTC  

Yeah he’s frozen rent and they’re not going to have to pay it back, the tenants could not pay for two years and it wouldn’t be a huge financial stress luckily

2020-03-29 21:10:47 UTC  

Which is enough to live 50 lifetimes over

2020-03-29 21:10:51 UTC  

Mad respect

2020-03-29 21:11:04 UTC  

Your dad is a great man

2020-03-29 21:11:39 UTC  

Lol thank you, I’ll make sure to tell him but I doubt he’ll understand why a random person on the internet is saying so <:salute:671540174928478239>

2020-03-29 21:11:40 UTC  

Only, you didn't ask them what their spending is, nor what their revenue is.

2020-03-29 21:12:14 UTC  

Say that i feel like i personally know him

2020-03-29 21:12:23 UTC  

if you're a businessman, and your company is going to shit, one billion will not be enough to save your company from certain death.

2020-03-29 21:12:23 UTC  

So my respect isn't random

2020-03-29 21:12:34 UTC  

It is personal tax not corporate tax

2020-03-29 21:12:49 UTC  

Still stands.

2020-03-29 21:12:59 UTC  

You'd just send the wealthy away.

2020-03-29 21:13:09 UTC  

1940's and 50's prove otherwise

2020-03-29 21:13:27 UTC  

We're talking about implementation of such taxation systems in the 21st century.

2020-03-29 21:13:34 UTC  

Forget about the 1940's.

2020-03-29 21:13:39 UTC  

@Winston Smith will do 👌, thank you for the respect towards us teachers

2020-03-29 21:13:43 UTC  

And if you have an economy that is middle-class depednant, if the wealthy leave

2020-03-29 21:13:47 UTC  

It makes literally no difference

2020-03-29 21:14:04 UTC  

You'd lose revenue, obviously, no matter how significant it was.

2020-03-29 21:14:15 UTC  

Not enough to matter

2020-03-29 21:14:31 UTC  

And if you'd tax the top bracket so heavily, then at one point, after having all the wealthy ones leaving, the middle class would be the top bracket.

2020-03-29 21:14:42 UTC  

Except the 50's prove

2020-03-29 21:14:43 UTC  

And what, would you tax them 90% as well?

2020-03-29 21:14:44 UTC  

They dont leave

2020-03-29 21:14:51 UTC  

...

2020-03-29 21:14:57 UTC  

We're talking about implementation of such taxation systems in the 21st century.
Forget about the 1950's.

2020-03-29 21:14:58 UTC  

The 50's arent some ancient era

2020-03-29 21:15:05 UTC  

They are modern history

2020-03-29 21:15:05 UTC  

Because Trump's got a point on this one.

2020-03-29 21:15:26 UTC  

Tax cuts for the wealthy brought in more companies.

2020-03-29 21:15:39 UTC  

Yes okay thank you for enlightening me, I didn't know that the 50's were modern history.

2020-03-29 21:15:42 UTC  

Trump himself admitted his tax breaks backfired, because giving tax cuts to them leave them to be greedy