You indirectly shrugged it off

because i want to move on with the debate

but does it invalidate my point

Does it invalidate any argument

you know to the thing we are actually here for

did a fallacy made in an online debate really irk you so much you pushed it for over 20 minutes

me big brian cause I use big words and call literally everything strawmanning

It's purpose isn't to invalidate your argument. The purpose of this is to establish for me whether or not you actually seek truth, or whether or not you engage a debate with a high ego, who's only intention is to dunk on someone
If its the latter, then that would explain why its taking you 30 fucking minutes to admitting a MINOR mistake. Why would i assume you will concede an argument if i point out a major contradiction, if you cant admit a minor error

LMAO

> It's purpose isn't to invalidate your argument. The purpose of this is to establish for me whether or not you actually seek truth, or whether or not you engage a debate with a high ego, who's only intention is to dunk on someone
> If its the latter, then that would explain why its taking you 30 fucking minutes to admitting a MINOR mistake. Why would i assume you will concede an argument if i point out a major contradiction, if you cant admit a minor error
@Sentient23

Yikes

Thank you SO much for proving my point right now

I'm so glad i actually thought of this the other day as a mechanism to establish whether someone's genuine or not

Its working

Thanks for proving my point

Adios

You don’t get anywhere in life if you push people for something that is irrelevant to the main topic at hand

🤡

Is this your tactic? Just repeat the conclusion of what you believe in without addressing my explanation as to why that conclusion is wrong? I explained how its relevant to ALL conversations me an you have, because if you are genuine, you wont have a problem with conceding a minor error, if you do have a problem with conceding a minor error, it means you have a big ego, if you have a big ego and its taking you 30 minutes to admit a minor error, then that's an indicator its going to take you MUCH LONGER to concede a major error when your argument gets refuted

Holy shit

why do acting because i made many mistakes

?

you just cannot push and push someone in a debate and then expect a formal apology

I didn’t directly formally apologize because I didn’t think it was a big deal

I never demanded a formal apology, again strawmaning me

it was a mistake

Not like I’m gonna get on my knees to argue with you

how many times is you gonna claim strawmaning

You've strawmanned me 3 times in addition to the original strawman

It is not a big deal THATS THE POINT! It not being a big deal and yet its taking you so much to admit it was an error directly, means your ego is too big to debate

I'm going to call out fallacies whenever you keep on committing them

You’re doing the same thing

> You've strawmanned me 3 times in addition to the original strawman
>
> It is not a big deal THATS THE POINT! It not being a big deal and yet its taking you so much to admit it was an error directly, means your ego is too big to debate
@Sentient23

Why are you expending so much effort

? How is it taking me so much to concede a minor error?

It’s a rhetorical question

what error are you demanding i concede

Yes i know im asking you to elaborate

Tfw you demand an apology from someone you’ve been berating and belittling for the past hour and then get triggered when they call you out

you can't just fucking barrage someone with this shit and expect them to even keep their sanity