Message from @valencia/Vaida
Discord ID: 686742488655855642
i explained how its releavnt
you never addressed that explanation neither lmao
it's really not
your explanation is s h i t
I'm noticing a pattern of what you do
1. ASsert something
2. Get refuted
3. Ignore the rebuttal
4. Re assert the thing that got refuted
Okay then refute it
How is it bad?
whats the problem with it?
Or are you incapable of doing so?
If you are then why claim its bad?
Are you going to a force someone to eat something they don’t like
Just because you want to figure out if they eat
No that's false equivolance fallacy
I'm also noticing a pattern with you
1. claim strawmaning
2. lose focus on the main argument
3. get angry
Also false analogy fallacy
I'm explaining why its perfectly relevant
I explained why its relevant
You just claimed that my explanatino was bad and yet you never addressed it
If i just went around asserting that your positions were all wrong with refusing to actually refute them, would it not be disingenuous?
Of course it would
Bruh has something happened to you
LOL thank you for proving my point for me
Im so glad i did this
I honestly have no idea what the original debate was about
I'm so glad i thought about this the other day as a test to see who's genuine and who isn't
I’ve said I’ve made a mistake
No
You've indirectly shrugged it off
then was ironic about it by saying 'I sTrAwMaNeD yOu"
Not even gonna waste the time to scroll back
Your ego is just obstructing you from directly admitting that you strawmaning me
I said I made a mistake way before that
He admitted the mistake
No
he INDIRECTLY conceded it, his ego is obstructing him from directly admitting to strawmaning @Florida Man
who's ego are we really talking about here?
I don't understand why you have to make a huge deal out of it @Sentient23
Again, already refuted that
@Florida Man let me explain
l