Message from @moira
Discord ID: 686747828294647813
and you fail to recognize your ego problem
youre proving my point for me
either you have become worse of a person or you are just showing your true colors
Again, i proved its relevant to ANY engagement with you
Again. Stop claiming something I've disproven
Either don't claim it at all or address my rebuttal
...
You do realize you have an ego
Valencia this is the third time you've typed that, if you don't have anything of value to add just please don't get involved
you have an ego problem based on you wanting validation for everything you do
you have an ego
Of course. We all have egos. However the difference is, some people control their egos and some ego's are little, and some are big
AGain
STOP claiming its for validation
ive PROVEN its not for validation
You havent addressed my proof
You're proving my point for me lmao
no you have not
Do you want me to quote myself? Sure
i am really not
> I'm not doing this for my ego buddy. I'm doing this to establish whether or not continuing a conversation with you is worth it. Simple
> If you cannot concede something minor, i have no reason to believe you will be able to concede something major, if i point out a contradiction
And haven’t been able to get over the fact I dont want to do something you want me to
@Sentient23 He admitted it an hour ago
Here's a quote of me disproving
address the quote i provided
or stop claiming its for validation
@Florida Man He did not misspeak. He strawmaned me
Let's see then
He said i believe in something that I dont, and then attacked that mischaracterization
> you made it a major issue
Of course its a major issue, its a CRUCIAL issue. Determiniing whether or not you're close minded establishes whether ANY kind of discussions with you should transpire
what you said applies to you too
Which thing that I said are you referring to?
Why should I have a conversation with you if you plan to argue with me on every fallacy I make
I admitted it an hour ago my guy
> I'm not doing this for my ego buddy. I'm doing this to establish whether or not continuing a conversation with you is worth it. Simple
> If you cannot concede something minor, i have no reason to believe you will be able to concede something major, if i point out a contradiction
@Sentient23 All you had to fucking do was to acknowledge he misspoke
Not to mention staying very, very, VERYfar away from the original topic of Morality within atheism, a topic you were so keen on arguing until you saw a mistake to get out of it.
Its not arguing on every fallacy. This is the first time i employed this strategy of establishing who's close minded and who isn't. If you admitted it easily, none of this would've happened
No. You INDIRECTLY conceded. Indirectly admitting a mistake isn't the same as directly
Again another strawman