Message from @ken_
Discord ID: 691440205173096448
i mean yeah
whenever Trump does anything people fucking gloat
if u say ur a capitalist they wont chimp as much as they would if u say nationalist
A chimping at nationalist is far different from a chimping at National Socialist
they think natioanlist is racist
and they think that racism is nazism
its conditioning by the jewish elites
there is this party that wants out of the EU and holds a mild view towards migrants
even they get branded nazis
Yes, of course and the Jews are involved once more.
eastern europe isn't AS cucked
ALL major parties are in cahoots with the JEws
Like you can easily say ur a nationalist in croatia
This doesn't sound like <#686291889653416085> though, let's take it to <#587028275918929925>.
but gl saying that in sweden or dutch
wait is dutch denmark?
no dutch is holland
dane is denmark
Holland is the name of two provinces
it's like calling the US "Washington"
<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***Ronin#2310 has been warned., Keep non-philosophical matters out of this channel.***
<@&682288520680964151> Daily Question:
Will the world be a better place if caste and religion cease to exist?
No
I like the world
Well, all aspects of the world would benefit from that, except for morality. Unless we find something else to stick to morally, like the law or something like that, then the world would become very immoral.
Religion is a tool to control people, really. It hasn't benefitted humanity that much. It brought death, hatred and disunity. So its absence would affect only the moral aspect of the world.
<:really:591181753625083905> lmao
Okay?
Bring back ancestor veneration.
Tell stories of your grandfather, your great uncle, your fearsome Aunt
Anybody in your family worth telling stories about.
no
because people will find other things to be dicks about
humans are also hard wired to establish some kind of hierarchy.
R/Atheism above
Religion is the original social construct.
it's a social construct with a practical application
the only social construct is thinking religion is a social construct
1. It would seem that it is at least possible to live a better or worse life,
2. If life were better off dead then the bloodline of organisms which prefer non-being would be self-limiting and select themselves out of being,
3. Hence being is good, and being well is best;
4. Every organism is endowed with certain capacities and forms, and these particular capacities and forms must exist because they are some approximation of the "objective laws" by which the universe operates (if your bloodline was not reflective of the objective laws of the universe, they would have been self-limiting and also select themselves out of being),
5. so fulfilling the capacities unique to human beings that allow us to partake in Eternal is objectively Good (or objectively in our self-interest),
6. and it would seem that our natures/souls (our capacities and forms) are fixed,
7. so the laws through which we partake in the Eternal (or best engender our particular human nature) are fixed as well,
8. hence for every particular nature there are a particular set of laws that, if broken, bring no True Good for the lawbreaker.
9. AKA - morality is objective
What is what
Why is what
What is the reason my forehead is huge